This is a note I wrote to Ray Schroth after by first reading of his new book The American Jesuits- a history...published by New York University Press and available on Amazon. The book is well written and insightful. Ray uses his journalistic talents to report about the Jesuits. A must read for all our class and anyone every educated by the Jesuits.
I have completed a quick read of your book: American Jesuits… and would like to put it the context of my latest book: "The Secret to GE's Success". I conclude that GE's success can be summarized in one word: TALENT..which stands for Leadership, Adaptability, Talent, Influence and Networks. So I used this framework to evaluate the Jesuits and this is what I have concluded:
LEADERSHIP… it is my conclusion that the AMERICAN JESUITS really never had a strong, continuous leadership. It was a confederation of Provinces..EACH out to create their own Universities… The most recent Leaders where more consistent with the early Jesuits…living and helping the underprivileged and not those that the Jesuit Universities were established to help…the more affluent.
ADAPTABILITY… Jesuits have not be pro-active, but slowly reactive… dealing with Blacks…and even the anti-war movements were late in their reaction… I really don’t think the “Company” had a US game plan and strategy… however they were very proliferate in initiating high schools that became colleges and partial Universities.
TALENT… mixed… there was a THREE tiered system… the bright… the normal and the workers.. On a personal note: I asked to apply and was denied since I was viewed as not in the first group… My personal experience at FORDHAM is that 90% of the Jesuits were in category one… and this has given me a false impression of the total population
INFLUENCE… the Jesuits were late in trying to influence what they believed was WRONG… Dan Berrigan was too late and took the wrong approach to make his point about the war… His assignment to BROOKLYN PREP…my alma mater may have been a strong indication that the Jesuits were not supportive of the BP and preferred the more elite schools… like REGIS and XAVIER…I think that they closed the wrong school and should have done what St. John’s did, move to LI… if they did, they would have had a strong presence on ISLAND and maybe even had a loyal group of Jesuits, since they were not the ACADEMICs that the other schools had.
NETWORKS… there was NO INTEGRATION AMONG THE PROVINCES…I AM NOT SURE WHAT A JESUIT UNIVERSITY really means today… since there was never a clear understanding in the past. You description of the initiation of and the limited resources of all other Universities, show that the “leadership?” thought that they could open Universities and they were highly dependent on CHEAP LABOR and never funded or endowed them.
RAY… I have written five books on strategic thinking, decision making and leadership AND I have concluded that based on my QUICK READ of you GREAT book… I think the AMERICAN JESUITS have not been strategic and have not had a strong execution plan… in fact, I would classified that the CURRENT STRATEGY IS HARVEST DIVEST… which means that the society will not exist in ten year… (Ray disagreed with this point and said they would be around for a long time...I disagree..)
I enjoyed the book, will read it again and learned a lot…but it is very disturbing to me, that the SOCIETY.. that taught me and is responsible for my growth and development, will not be around for my grandchildren…
Bill Rothschild
By the way... this is a letter from the Jesuit Father General that appears in the November 28th newsletter... it confirms that they are finally recognizing there is a vocation criss... it also confirms my point about a lack of leadership...this could be "too little...too late".
The Vocation Emergency. This is a letter from the Father General about vocations:
The first thing to note is that, even in the current situation of “vocation emergency” in the Society, only one postulate was received on vocation promotion. The postulate requests that each Province establish an ongoing program for vocation promotion for finding, welcoming and accompanying qualified candidates to the Society of Jesus in each culture, region and province
The main question is: Why are there few vocations in some parts of the Society, and what can we do about it? Although it is true that vocation promoters are doing their best through various activities and initiatives, there is a need to do a more thorough research on the causes of the diminishing number of vocations and to carry out an exchange on best practices in vocation promotion.
Our search for recruits should keep in the forefront of our mind that “because … the missions on which the Holy Father and our superiors are likely to send (us) demand trained minds and dedicated spirits,” (GC 32.D.2, 25) our candidates should be those who can truly profit from the “spiritual and intellectual formation more than ordinarily exacting” (ibid.) the Society offers to the best of its ability. Hence, there needs to be clear insistence on the quality of the candidates we accept. The coetus praevius recommends that vocation promotion be a topic for discussion at GC 35, with the hope that it may produce some recommendations for Fr. General and the ordinary government of the Society.
Documents GC 34, decree 10.
Complementary Norms, 412
|